Layout:
Home > A New Stimulus - Refunds?

A New Stimulus - Refunds?

January 22nd, 2009 at 05:29 pm

I had a comment, from D, on my last entry about filing taxes now and whether a tax refund of $1K that has yet to be passed by congress would effect our refunds.

I found an answer. The tax cuts would come in the form of reductions in the amount of social security tax that is withheld from paychecks. For those of us who might be able to file our taxes any day, this will not impact our refunds. No reason to delay.

Here's a link to the

Text is article and Link is http://topics.nytimes.com/topics/reference/timestopics/subjects/u/united_states_economy/economic_stimulus/
article. It is in today's New York Times.

4 Responses to “A New Stimulus - Refunds?”

  1. Nika Says:
    1232645927

    This does nothing good for the economy in the long term - the effects will be very short lived and costs are too high.

    Besides, most of that money will be spent in cheap stores like Wallmart on chinese goods.

    Giving money to the states for infrastructure projects at least has some longer-term benefits that future generations (who will be saddled with debt for all these handouts) would get at least some benefit from.

  2. creditcardfree Says:
    1232646505

    Nika, I agree with you! I'm just giving facts, as they are presently known.

  3. monkeymama Says:
    1232647629

    Not holding my breath for this stimulus - it doesn't make any sense.

    When I first heard it all I Thought was, "Obama doesn't understand that the only payroll tax that individuals pay is social security." (Most payroll taxes are funded by employers - Unemployment for example). HE obviously doesn't intend to cut social security funding and so his rhetoric is flawed. Of course, neither candidate seemed to have much grasp of tax law. They said a lot of things that made no sense. If this stimulus comes through it will come from elsewhere. There is a reason the other stimuluses were administrated by the IRS and through the income tax system. FAR simpler. To mess with payroll taxes is a very expensive endeavor (new forms, educating employers on the changes, hiring accountants to figure it all out, etc., etc.).

    He could have simply meant that it will come through lowering income tax withholding from paychecks. But that is also a far more complicated way to do it. But I have thought that was what he really meant. Though withholding is not a "payroll tax" in my accounting jargon.

  4. D Says:
    1233259861

    Thanks for responding to my question. I read this awhile back, but have not had time to respond to you. I blogged about this on my blog and created a link back to you. Thanks for the article and explanation.

Leave a Reply

(Note: If you were logged in, we could automatically fill in these fields for you.)
*
Will not be published.
   

* Please spell out the number 4.  [ Why? ]

vB Code: You can use these tags: [b] [i] [u] [url] [email]